Forgive us, Cubs fans, if we are unable to feel your pain. At least your team made the playoffs.
We're sorry, Patriots supporters, if we can't understand why you'd boo a team that loses one game following 21 straight regular-season victories. Even if the sun is setting on your dynasty, at least you had one.
We apologize to you, Ohio State football fans, for we fail to understand why you constantly wring your hands. You won the championship in 2002, and we do hope your Buckeyes win the big one again some day. Then please tell our local team how to win a game.
Perhaps most deserving of pity is you, the basketball fans of Oklahoma City. Because if you decide at some point in the future that the tax dollars you are currently throwing at your new NBA team would be better spent on roads or schools or public safety, then you, too, could end up feeling our pain.
With all due respect to all of those mentioned above, you don't have a clue about misery. You really want to know pain? Stare into the sad, shell-shocked eyes of a Seattle sports fan.
No region has more lovely sights than the Puget Sound. And no region has a collection of sports teams this grotesque.
How low has Seattle fallen? The River Styx has already been crossed, and Hades is on the horizon. At least it feels that way.
The list of unpleasantness is long and painful, but since football is in full swing, we'll begin on the gridiron.
Seattle Seahawks, NFL
Record: 2-5
Last championship: Are you serious?
Ah, the Seahawks. Just three seasons removed from a trip to the Super Bowl (they lost, of course), the Seahawks find themselves with a 2-5 record, somehow good for a tie for second place in the NFC West.
This is a division so bad, the Seahawks have won it four straight times despite being outscored over the course of two of those seasons. This sorry bunch includes the Cardinals (best known for Matt Leinart's beer bong parties) the Rams (lamest show on turf) and the 49ers (quarterbacked by guys named J.T. O'Sullivan and Shaun Hill).
The fall has been alarming since the Super Bowl, but essentially boils down to this equation:
Management goof allows Steve Hutchinson to bolt to the Vikings + Shaun Alexander deteriorates from somewhat soft to delicate as Charmin + Matt Hasselbeck gets hurt + defense forgets that its job is to stop other team = 2-5.
To make matters worse, the 49ers might be trying to steal coach Mike Holmgren, who says he's ready to retire — but only from the Seahawks. Hard to blame him at this point.
Washington Huskies, college football
Record: 0-7
Last championship: 1991, shared with Miami
In 2004, Tyrone Willingham was called in to lend stability to a mess left by previous coaches Rick Neuheisel and Keith Gilbertson, whose combined missteps helped turn a once-strong program into a national laughingstock.
Willingham accomplished his job initially, cleaning up the program and bringing in a wealth of fine young student-athletes (as he would call them). They're not particularly big, and not particularly fast. But they go to class, play very hard, and never give up, which is a nice way of saying that they're also not particularly skilled.
A lack of skill, however, does not apply to quarterback Jake Locker. The recruiting jewel of Willingham's time at Washington, Locker could develop into a modern-day Fran Tarkenton, only bigger and faster, and without all the touchdown passes.
At this point, however, it appears more likely he'll develop into a physical therapist. You see, Locker broke the thumb on his throwing hand — while blocking on a reverse play, of all things — and is probably done for the season.
It's too bad for Willingham that he had to be fired, but when so few of his fine student-athletes can play football, that's the way it goes.
The good news for Huskies fans is that their squad is not the worst team in the state. That honor belongs to their rivals across the mountains.
Washington State Cougars, college football
Record: 1-7
Last championship: Surely you jest
The Cougars are not, technically, a Seattle team. Their campus is located across the state, nestled amongst the rolling fields of the Palouse, just a Ryan Leaf Hail Mary from the Idaho border. But as many young and eager WSU graduates settle in the Puget Sound region, there is hardly a shortage of Cougar-related angst in Seattle these days.
Washington State's football program has never been able to sustain occasional flashes of promise. Look up the phrase "Cougin It" in the urban dictionary and there is a rather colorful description of Wazzu's amazing ability to find new and creative ways to blow surefire victories. Thoughts of surrendering late leads must give the current fan base a warm sense of nostalgia.
This season's problems started in May, when new coach Paul Wulff lost eight scholarships, punished by the NCAA for the program's poor academic record. By the time autumn rolled around, you wondered if the Cougars only had eight scholarship players to begin with.
Washington State's lone victory came against Portland State, a Championship Subdivision team (formerly Div. I-AA) that is 3-4. In the other seven games, the Cougars have lost by an average score of 54-9.
Worst team in Pac-10 history? That honor could be decided in the Apple Cup.
Seattle Mariners, Major League (allegedly) Baseball
Record: 61-101 in 2008
Last championship: One of only three teams (Rangers, Expos/Nationals) to never play in the World Series
The Mariners were thought to be contenders after a solid 2007 season. They traded for ace Erik Bedard, giving up a load of young talent in the deal, and signed Carlos Silva. What a rotation! Here come the playoffs!
Uh, no.
Instead, the Mariners finished dead last, 14 1/2 games out of third place. On the bright side, they did make history … as the first team with a payroll of more than $100 million to lose at least 100 games. The Mariners paid nearly $2 million for each victory (second only to the Yankees). So at least that's something they're good at.
But this sorry bunch doesn't even know how to lose properly, handing the No. 1 overall draft pick to the Nats after a pointless, season-ending sweep of the Oakland A's.
Think the future is bright? Well, let's just say new general manager Jack Zduriencik has his hands full. Only two of the franchise's seven minor league teams made the postseason in 2008.
Seattle SuperSonics, NBA
Record: 20-62 in 2008
Last championship: 1979
The Sonics are currently masquerading as the Oklahoma City Thunder, and it's difficult to see why no one saw it coming.
Rich man from Oklahoma City buys Sonics. Oklahoma City has an unused arena, a city that had just successfully hosted the Hornets when Hurricane Katrina chased the team out of New Orleans.
But the rich man said he was committed to making things work in Seattle. He wouldn't lie would he?
You've heard the line from The Godfather right? "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse." Well, Sonics owner Clay Bennett was going to make Seattle an offer it couldn't accept.
He insisted he wanted to stay in Seattle. All he needed was $500 million in taxpayer funds to build a new arena in Renton, about 20 minutes (in good traffic) south of Seattle.
If he had expected the public to actually go for that wonderful idea, then he would've instead asked for $1 billion to build an arena in Walla Walla. And throw in a free Starbucks every day, too.
Then, after being rejected, he could throw his hands up in the air and whine to David Stern. "See what I'm dealing with here? These people are impossible! Well, at least I tried. Hmmm, wonder what's going on in OKC?"
Bennett also spoke about how much he loved Staples Center, home of the Lakers and Clippers, and how nice it would be to have such a beautiful palace in Seattle. He failed to mention that Staples Center was privately financed.
Stern, a buddy of Bennett's who will occasionally lob thinly veiled threats at cities with what he deems inadequate facilities (you're next Milwaukee!), has been amazingly sympathetic and kind-hearted toward Seattle fans.
Recently, he offered this helpful advice: "You know, we have something over 900 games available on NBA League Pass … So there's a lot out there in terms of content and a lot of an ability to follow our league. If they are so inclined, then we certainly invite them and welcome them."
So the team is gone, but at least we can still watch them play on TV … for a small fee. Wonderful.
Forgive us, Mr. Stern, if we pass on that generous offer. We'll be too busy watching junior hockey. We hear the Seattle Thunderbirds aren't in last place. Yet.



Can anyone recall a city having a collection of teams this bad?
If the Phillies somehow end up losing the World Series, I submit Philadelphia as the pathetic sports city, taking a long term view of course. This is a four sport city that hasn't won a significant Championship (Bon Jovi's Philadelphia Soul do not count) since the early '80s, and is home to the most losing franchise in sports history.
If we are looking short term, then I submit Cincinnati. Yea it lacks a basketball team, but technically so does Seattle now. The Bengals are far worst than the Seahawks, and the Reds haven't been good in ages, unlike the Mariners who recently have the record for most wins in the regular season. And at least Seattle has some non-sports perks to being a resident, Cincinnati is still Cincinnati.
Um, Phoenix? Kansas City?
I know the Microsoft attitude of "the world revolves around us, isn't that plainly evident?" is prevalent in Seattle, but please...
Actually I don't work for Microsoft, and I have kids so I know the world doesn't revolve around me. :) That being said....
Kansas City: OK I give you the Royals and Chiefs, but don't they claim the Kansas Jayhawks as their own? They just won the national title in hoops and have a strong football team. Same with the Missouri Tigers.
Phoenix: It's not even close. The D-backs went to the ALCS in 2007 and won the World Series in 2001. ASU went to the Holiday Bowl last season and the Suns have made the playoffs in 18 of the last 20 seasons. Even the Cardinals are currently in first place.
Good argument for Cincy, Adam. I guess I still remember Lou Piniella's 1990 title team like it was yesterday. I think the Bearcats would probably destroy the Huskies or Cougars, but still, you put forth a good point.
I'm less inclined to go with you on Philly, especially as a long-term argument. The Eagles and Seahawks are pretty much a wash, especially recently, I suppose. But you gotta give the Phillies the edge on the M's. At least the Phillies have a title and get to play for another. The Mariners didn't even reach the World Series the year they won 116 games. And the 76ers' history dwarfs the Sonics'. Not to mention they're still playing in Philly. :)
Ooops.. that's the NLCS for the D-backs, of course, not the ALCS.
Yea, but there are other extenuating circumstances, Philly teams have far longer histories, so the pain of losing spans generations. Philadelphia also sits in the constant shadow of New York, so when the Phillies won the division the past two years, the talk was about how the Mets blew it, not how the Phillies won it. This isn't even to mention freaking Eli Manning. Seattle just doesn't have another city that plays the New York factor.
Plus you have to look at the Philadelphia and the Philly fans themselves. Let's just say that Rocky would have never worked if it was set in Seattle. They also don't go making movies about walk-on special teamers on the Seattle Seahawks.
The weirdest thing is that probably the most popular "athlete" from Philadelphia in the past decade was probably Smarty Jones, a damn race horse.
As for the Phillies over the Mariners, I don't think that's possible, considering that the Phillies are the losingest franchise in all of sports history. That's not opinion, that's fact ;-)
Since the Sonics no longer exist, they don't really count anymore. When the city can't even support a team, then they can't complain about them losing or moving.
Loving this discussion. Here we are, arguing about which city has worse sports, as if that's some sort of feather in the cap. :)
Anyway, here's my counter ...
-- The Sonics DO count right now, because their departure is the main reason for the pain. The Sonics were the city's oldest pro sports franchise and now they're gone. Imagine if the Phillies left.
-- It's true that the Phillies have more losses than anyone, but since they've been playing for 125 years, and the Mariners for only 31, a better comparison is winning percentage. The teams, are dead even at .470. The Rangers (.468) and Padres (.462) are worse. Phillies have six pennants and one title (maybe two?). Mariners 0 and 0.
Phillies fans are more passionate -- by far. I give you that. But that doesn't in itself make the teams worse. The base of the story is about the overwhelming depression of all the teams being horrible at once, and I don't see that in Philly right now.
I can do that because I'm a NY fan (Yankees and Jets) so I don't have the emotional attachment that actual Philly fans do. That said, I'm also from the area of Central New Jersey where the allegiances between New York and Philly meet, so I know a ton of Philly fans, and I interact with them all of the time, plus I get to listen to Philly sports coverage on TV, print and radio.
Since none of my chosen teams have any sort of rivalry or even play Philadelphia teams all that often, I have taken to following the Philly Sports scene (or at least the Eagles and Phillies), because one can never have too much sports, and it's fun when they beet the Giants and Mets.
So maybe right now, at this specific point of time, Seattle has it worst off. But I think as a "tortured" city suffering long time losing, Seattle has a ways to go.
Also, I did not realize the Rangers were that awful. Some of that must have been from their Senator days, right? I like what the NFL did with the Browns, I think that when a team changes cities, its tradition and history should stay with the original city. Hell, cities give teams enough perks now with tax advantages and stadium monies, its time that cities get a little in return. Likewise, Seattle should get to keep the Supersonics traditions and history, while the OKC Thunder should be forced to start of fresh with no past records or traditions. That way, if for some reason another team wanted to come to Seattle, or expand to Seattle, they can just pickup the Supersonics and run with them.
Seattle has a long way to go, history-wise. Simply not that old a city. And the people as a whole don't care nearly as much.
The Rangers stat does include the Senators numbers. I found the info here (http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/).
As for the Sonics, that history will stay in Seattle if the city gets a new team ... maybe. It's actually quite a mess.
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-33-18/Clay-Bennett-Didn-t-Exactly-Give-Up-that-Sonic-Legacy.html
It's Kansas City, Missouri Bob. You can start claiming the Portland Trailblazers if you want to include them. I know, I have family there and none of them are Jayhawks fans. They root for Mizzou, which just choked away a chance at the national title.
Oh I'm aware of where Kansas City is. Lawrence is only 45 minutes away. It's actually closer than Columbia. I know a Jayhawk grad, and he knows plenty of KU fans in Kansas City, Missouri.
And Mizzou choking away a shot at a national title? Personally I'd take that over 1-14 (combined record of Huskies and Cougars) anyday.
And just so you know, some Seattle fans do root for the Blazers, even though Portland is 3 hours away. Their fan base will probably grow now that the Sonics are gone.
Bob,
The Seattle Sounders, the area's United Soccer League team, are perennial contenders for that league's championship year in, year out, and have won it in 1995, 1996, 2005 and 2007. Since USL teams often hold their own versus MLS teams, they can rightly be considered one of your area's few winning teams - especially if you're deciding to count College Football.
And although USL's Seattle Sounders are closing their doors at the end of the 2008 season, they're doing so to make way for Sounders FC, MLS's newest franchise that's set to open shop in April 2009 at Qwest Field. They've already got some big-name signings on board and they're sponsored by Microsoft to boot (figures, right?).
And while few Baseball, Basketball and Football fans know little about soccer (or even care to), Sounders FC may be the Seattle area's best chance at claiming any sort of (positive) professional (or even semi-pro) accomplishment anytime soon. So you guys should consider cheering them on, lest they decide to leave town as well.
The Sounders FC are my last hope at actually enjoying a ballgame in the coming year. I've written off the Seahawks after yesterday's pathetic loss.
Good point King. I could also have included the Seattle Storm, who Bennett sold to local investors, and who won a championship in 2004.
For sake of brevity, this article focused on big-revenue sports, but you're right, there are some places to see some good teams in the Seattle area.
Great article Bob. It's articles like these that make me feel good about my Pittsburgh Steelers and Pitt Panthers. :-)
Thank you Sgt. Pepper, and you're welcome, too. So glad I could be of service. :)